All activities and creativity of human, which is associated with verbal and written utterance, addressed to another human, has especially meaning in social life. Can become a source of good or bad.
Only someone irresponsible for the word, doesn't make much of this, whether, that which will tell or will write is true. It's a pity, that many journalists, politicans and party activists don't wonder about this, that each of them is responsible for own words.
It's after all the difference between the promise of a mechanic, who doesn't meet the promised deadline of a car repair - and the leader of the party, who doesn't fulfill the promises made to voters. In the first case the matter concerned only two persons, whereas in the second - a large social group. Effects of such broken promises they do havoc in the other person, adjusting him negativly to social life and to the promises made by people, regardless of who they are and how position they hold.
A disappointed man is becoming insensitive. Then arise bias, objections, divisions between people, which are of reflecting in the general anesthesia.
AND A POET, WRITER?
A creator can do all with his hero. Besot him and make fun of him, put on a pedestal, hide behind its wisdom or stupidity - pretend to be wiser than he. Can convince, that the behavior of a hero is proper or reprehensible, may also represent his thoughts and judgments, assign him a good or bad character. Can also control the hero at own discretion. He must remember, that at the moment when his writing enters into force on another person, begins with the responsibility for the word.
If the writer is the only this, who describes it, what actually was, which is - this should be unambiguously result from his writing. But if his writing is in some extent the creator of morality, then begins to take overall responsibility for the word - it can be an ally or a destroyer, not just social order, but also the mental life and individual of man.
Andrzej Kijowski wrote in a critical trial "Writer and hero": "The writer is himself the hero of modern literature. So if he want, so that his writings had a social important must remove the mask, for which he is hiding and present himself such, as he is in fact."
Perhaps I will expose myself for some, if I write, that Gombrowicz, although he was in a some sense a brilliant, but he wore in himself a somewhat tragic concepcion of man. Although he moved masterfully in endless mazes of human destiny, but with convictions, that this tragic world was for human long time since intended by someone, and a man just has to live in it. Just enough, that agreeing with it and accepting the tragic nature as fate, this is reject the pursuit of a better human and a better world.
The opposing view presents Stanisław Barańczak. In the introduction to his "Record" wrote: "We must not kill own hands the word, culture, truth and huamn values."
Not about hands killing, but the killing the higher values in the human mind. When a person is subjected to the tragic nature, who is touches him, is degenerating, becoming wild, ceases to be an instrument of sensitivity, and give voice to anesthesia, and even nihilism. In this situation must raise the question: If then it will be possible to live among those, who in name only will be people?
In the literature we observe ever-increasing trends degenerating a human - this requires an analytical glance for all written word.
Word of the creator powinno should give the reader to understand, that constantly is seeing a fight between inherent in man the forces of good and evil, regardless of the professed religion and the eschatological beliefs, and human action should seek to rebuild its forces, which enabling increasingly higher form of its development, including also the moral.
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE WORD
"Man himself is responsible for your words. Every - whether desired, or not - manifests itself in the word. If the heart good, mouth speaks good , like a good tree bears good fruit. If while the heart is bad, then mouth convey bad fruit. ... Sometimes, that people are saying a bad word, they grab behind the mouth, if they wanted to erase them. Meanwhile the mouth is not guilty, this heart is guilty. It's necessary the heart to fill with beauty, wealth, good. It's necessary the heart make a treasure, from which the owner can be proud, but not a dustbin, of which must be ashamed. ... Listen intently your own words, because in them we see the richness or poverty of your own heart. Let's listen to the words of people standing next to us, because in them we see the best, who they are in fact, what is the value of their hearts.
,From abundance of the heart the mouth speaks.'"